|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Roemy Schneider
Vanishing Point.
   |
Posted - 2009.11.12 11:32:00 -
[1]
i may hate capitals-online but this is just one of those facepalm-ideas
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
Roemy Schneider
Vanishing Point.
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 16:13:00 -
[2]
lol drone control units
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
Roemy Schneider
Vanishing Point.
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:09:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: CCP Navigator
constructive
glad to see you are capable of spelling that.
i started doubting
1) sov: no matter how you spin it it's still a fresh isk sink and a HUGE one to boot. if you decide to ram up your GTC income, just say so. all the noble robin-hood'ery of making null-sec accessible for the little guy is a charade considering the steep costs, the 750,000m¦ hubs and the remaining few entry systems. there was a time when you made sense; null sec had to be made easier so there'd be more pewpew.
good times...
2) moms: everything said, really. all that's left is mentioning the explosion radius bonus of 7.5% to prove your acting. sure, a weapon against only caps... mhmm 
3) T2 component reshuffle : i hear you hired an economist who should be able to fly and produce T2 by now. after all these years, i'm sure he's had a go at a complex reaction aswell, because i doubt tritanium can keep a newbie interest for all those quarters. i don't see his influence at all; the problem got shoved around yet the bottleneck is going to be even worse: limited to one moon mineral instead of two and there's no alchemy to replace it.
4) projectile boost : let's continue the arms race! there would have been nothing wrong with nerfing amarr a bit. taking back one/two of the boosts, like tracking, would not have been a sign a weakness - apparently your biggest fear. the world has changed since the little skirmishes got nerf along with speed.
and then there was the probing stuff noah was talking about at the pvp round table. he did sound like these little pivot substractions necessary to move probes in as you make them "smaller" were in in place on your internal servers? along with the dozen of other probing bugs. no matter how valid i'm sure those bug reports are being added to the noise statistic. sry hunter, you sold your department really well and i think you came across as a capable organizer. but your bug hunters are just ****. there's a reason so many countries got rid of general conscription and just went for "professional" armies.
honestly guys, the SWG comparisons may just seem trolls to you but there's just way more truth to it than what would be considered a healthy dosage.
NO YOU! ...are not being constructive - just doing "something" doesn't qualify
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
Roemy Schneider
Vanishing Point.
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 21:57:00 -
[4]
what if.... carrier level added +1 and DCU added +2 or +3?
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
Roemy Schneider
Vanishing Point.
|
Posted - 2009.11.15 04:12:00 -
[5]
33560 trit per 100 doom torpedoes
128100 doom torpedoes per t1-rigged iteron
9 iterons per dock'able mom
...
386,913,240 trit per mom's ship bay
(plus another 89mil trit in its drone bay in form of 9000 maintenance bots)
sure, we can do this now already, but fiddling with the 9 iterons is a PITA
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
|
|
| |
|